index.php/peercache/faq/enduser). This report does not reconcile this reported preference for faster,
fileserver-based file transfers with representations about the alleged advantages of peer-to-peer file
transfers made to the Supreme Court and the Federal Trade Commission. See, e.g., MGM Studios, Inc. v.
Grokster, Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 2764, 2770 (2005) ("[peer-to-peer] file ... retrievals may be faster than on other
types of networks"); Brief for Respondents at 3, MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., No. 04-480 (March 1,
2005) ("if material sought by a user already resides on other users' computers that can be accessed over
already-in-place communication lines, then it is a wasteful redundancy also to store the material on a group
of central servers").